Chinese scientists found rare substances on the moon, and the United States also brought back lunar soil. Why didn't they find them?
According to reports, since the beginning of this year, NASA's "return to the moon" plan has failed successively. Now, due to the problems that cannot be solved in the short term in the new generation of lunar rockets, NASA has to significantly postpone the "return to the moon" plan. Some Scholars said that it is still unknown whether NASA will be able to test flights again this year. After the news was uploaded on the Internet, many netizens at home and abroad said that NASA's strength is not as good as before, and some netizens questioned: 50 years ago, NASA in the United States could land on the moon. Not going to the moon? Especially a few days ago, by analyzing the lunar soil samples brought back by "Chang'e 5", Chinese scientists discovered a brand new mineral, named "Chang'e Stone". After this scientific achievement was announced internationally, Once again, NASA lost face, and the United States' plan to "return to the moon" quickly became the focus of heated discussions, and netizens raised doubts. So, "Chang'e 5" only brought back 1731 grams of lunar soil samples, and achieved so many scientific research results, and NASA brought back 380 kilograms of lunar soil samples, why have there been no major discoveries so far? Has NASA really been to the moon? Pay attention to the messenger of the singularity and keep abreast of the latest scientific informationLet's take a look at the first question, why did NASA bring back 380 kg of lunar soil , but no major discoveries?
Actually, the lunar soil samples brought back by NASA are not without harvest, but the harvest is very small. From the data point of view, NASA has discovered at least 4 new mineral compositions, namely "Almaco Moon Stone", "Ticlinite", "Yoshi Yaoke Stone" and "Jinghai Stone". , NASA did land on the moon 50 years ago, not as people guessed, everything was "posed" in a Hollywood studio. However, if this does not convince, let us look at two more convincing deeds. So, what evidence is there that the United States has ever landed a man on the moon?
In 1972, Nixon's visit to my country presented a one-gram sample of lunar soil to our country. At that time, Chinese scientist Ouyang Ziyuan led the scientific research team and published many papers using only 0.5 gram of lunar soil sample. This scientific research paper found many differences between the moon and the earth, which is also one of the evidences that Chinese scientists have proved that the United States has been to the moon. In addition, Zheng Yongchun, a researcher at the National Astronomical Observatory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, also said that the Apollo landing on the moon must be true, because after the US manned landing on the moon, a large number of traces were left on the moon, and these traces can be photographed. For example, my country's "Chang'e-2", India's "Chandrayaan-1", and the United States' own lunar probe have photographed the traces left by the United States' manned landing on the moon 50 years ago. It can be seen that the traces of the lunar wheel, the objects left by the lunar rover, and some experimental equipment, etc., even the traces of the eruption after the lander landed can be clearly seen. Not only that, our Chang'e series of satellites and probes have also taken a lot of pictures of the moon. The Stars and Stripes of the United States and the traces of the moon landing are still preserved on the moon. All kinds of evidence show that the United States did successfully manned the moon. Therefore, the authenticity of NASA's manned moon landing 50 years ago is beyond doubt. But there is still a question here. Both China and the United States brought back lunar soil from the moon. Why did the "Chang'e 5" bring back the lunar soil? Soil samples, new discoveries are constantly coming in, but why can’t such minerals be found in NASA’s lunar soil?
In fact, this is mainly because NASA's lunar landing site that year was different from the "Chang'e 5" landing sampling site, which eventually led to a big difference in the composition of the lunar soil samples brought back. To give a simple example, it is all sand, the sand taken from the seaside, and the sand taken from the Sahara Desert. If you compare and analyze the two, you will find that the components are completely different. After all, the geographical location, climate and environment They are all different, and it is normal to have differences. Such an interesting point of knowledge, since NASA was able to land on the moon 50 years ago, why not now?
One of the main reasons is that NASA's manned moon landing technology 50 years ago is no longer practical. If NASA continues to use the technology of 50 years ago, they may successfully land on the moon, but they cannot do it on the moon. For scientific research, there is no way to build a space station around the moon, and it is even more impossible to use lunar resources as a springboard to realize NASA's manned landing plan on Mars. Therefore, considering the overall situation, the United States has to put down its face and conduct research and development based on actual needs. In addition, the background of NASA's moon landing 50 years ago was very special. At that time, the United States and the former Soviet Union were in the middle of the Cold War, and no one was willing to give in in the contest between the two. Therefore, in the early days of the "space race", after the United States was led by the former Soviet Union, With the power of the whole country, the "Apollo Moon Landing Program" was formulated. You must know that at that time, the number of scientific researchers involved in this program was as high as 300,000. But now NASA is not what it used to be. NASA needs to reduce costs as much as possible within limited funds, so that it can carry out more space projects. Therefore, in the eyes of the United States, "returning to the moon" is just space. One of the plans, it is not worth the effort of the whole country to study this project. In addition, after the restart of the moon landing, because the technology 50 years ago is outdated, the launch system, lunar rocket, manned spacecraft, and even the protective clothing worn by astronauts need to be redesigned and developed, and tested one by one. , Naturally, for NASA, although it is called "returning to the moon", in fact everything is equivalent to "starting from scratch". We can understand the problems encountered by NASA's current launch rockets many times. They are not "returning to the moon", but trying to land on the moon in a different way. Therefore, new technologies face new challenges. Today's United States wants to land on the moon, in fact, from scratch. It can be seen from this, friends, 50 years ago, the United States did land on the moon, but the past let it pass. Now we need to pay attention to what the next plan of NASA's "return to the moon" will be, and pay attention to our country How is the progress of the manned lunar landing program? After all, the space exploration business in the 21st century, everyone with a discerning eye knows that this is a space competition between my country and the United States. The future is an era of competition for space resources. Friends, who do you think my country and the United States will be? What about becoming the first country to land a man on the moon in the 21st century? Who do you think will become the "space overlord" in the future? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss that I am a singularity messenger, follow me, the next issue will be more exciting